Why Vibe Coding’s Latest Move Is Shaking Up the Build vs. Buy Battle Like Never Before
Remember when everyone swore SaaS was the holy grail, until suddenly it wasn’t? Well, thanks to this new kid on the block called vibe coding, the age-old build vs. buy software debate is back—and it’s louder than ever. The question swirling around the water cooler these days is simple yet profound: if AI can whip up software like magic, why pay a vendor when you could just roll up your sleeves and build your own? Sounds tempting, right? But let me tell you, this isn’t the first rodeo. Cast your mind back to the 2000s, when homemade software was as clunky and frustrating as dial-up internet on a stormy day. Everyone ranted about it until packaged software finally saved the day. So, are we ready to dive into this coding renaissance or just stumbling into the same trap? Either way, it’s one heck of a story to watch unfold. LEARN MORE.
Thanks to vibe coding, the build vs. buy debate has rekindled over the past year, with numerous headlines pronouncing “SAAS is dead.” The argument is:
AI makes coding software so easy, why wouldn’t companies build what they need instead of paying a vendor for it?
The last time this debate was had was in the 2000s. Then, plenty of companies had legacy homegrown software. Plus, anytime you hired someone from Amazon, they wanted to build everything from scratch—whether it was email service provider functionality or a content management system or a personalization engine. It was a bit of a running joke.
What wasn’t funny was how horrible virtually all homegrown software was. Everyone complained about it—how it was clunky, outdated, and literally unfixable. And they always cheered when it was finally replaced by packaged software.
>> Read the entire post in Zeta Global’s Resource Center
Post Comment